Tue 11 Dec 2007
New Light Source Lasts 15 Years Without a Recharge
Posted by ecoble under Earth-Friendly Products, Energy and Power, Sustainable Innovation
How about a glowing light source that lasts for 15 years instead of the typical 15 minutes of a glowstick? GlowPaint’s newest product does just that and is also non-toxic and inexpensive and doesn’t require a recharge via solar or electrical sources for its entire lifespan. According to the company, “This has potential to save billions in energy costs world-wide. Litroenergy™ surpasses all known available lighting options for cost/durability/reliability and safety.” Their products are expected to be used to replace other forms of safety, emergency and novelty lighting duties normally performed by glow sticks, LEDs and other light sources.

“The Litrospheres are not effected by heat or cold, and are 5,000-pound crush resistant. They can be injection molded or added to paint. The fill rate of Litroenergy micro particles in plastic injection molding material or paint is about 20%. The constant light gives off no U.V. rays, and can be designed to emit almost any color of light desired.” PureEnergySystems

Litroenergy was also submitted to the Nasa Create the Future Design Contest to compete based on its originality and potentially major impact on sustainable energy technology. More information can be found via GlowPaint’s online patent application though much of their research remains proprietary.
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from 7 Brilliant-but-Questionable Eco-Power Innovations » ecoble - ecological design, green innovation and environmental sustainability
February 25th, 2008 at 4:52 pm[...] A 15-Year Light Source that requires no recharges sounds great - at first anyway. It seems that this GloPaint innovation will last a long time as promised but leftover materials are of questionable toxicity so there is still waste to be considered - just fifteen years later. This may help replace emergency lighting in the short term but still isn’t a long term solution. Spread the Green These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]
-
Trackback from meneame.net
May 20th, 2008 at 3:17 amNueva fuente de luz que dura 15 años…
¿Qué le parece una fuente de luz brillante que dura 15 años, en lugar de los típicos 15 minutos?…
-
Pingback from hURRLey - i am social bookmarking!
May 20th, 2008 at 6:51 am[...] | incoming hURRLs | getting started | FAQ | blog Voila, the hURRL you reqested …1 hURRLs - New Light Source Lasts 15 Years Without a Recharge | ecoble [...] (first hURRLed by MrCoool @ 12 seconds ago /// permalink) MrCoool says:”Amazing! I want [...]
-
Trackback from www.buzzflash.net
May 20th, 2008 at 6:52 pmNew Light Source Lasts 15 Years Without a Recharge…
How about a glowing light source that lasts for 15 years instead of the typical 15 minutes of a glowstick? GlowPaint’s newest product does just that and is also non-toxic and inexpensive and doesn’t require a recharge via solar or electrical source…
-
Pingback from New Light Source That Lasts More Than A Decade at Maple3
May 21st, 2008 at 11:55 pm[...] - Ecoble Filed under Eco-product, Energy, Technology [...]
-
Pingback from New Light Source Lasts 15 Years Without a Recharge « Fun in Life ….
May 23rd, 2008 at 3:04 am[...] Fun in Life …. Fun can be hidden in small words …. « Job Application New Light Source Lasts 15 Years Without a Recharge May 23, 2008 check this out. [...]



December 14th, 2007 at 8:03 pm
when and where can I buy some?
December 16th, 2007 at 11:22 am
when and where can I buy some? Please send me info.
December 16th, 2007 at 5:45 pm
There are too many applications for this, where to start?
December 16th, 2007 at 8:54 pm
sounds expensive
December 24th, 2007 at 12:34 am
Make a cool Tron costume.
Would be very nice for emergency vehicals, also.
December 29th, 2007 at 1:59 am
Why yes, I would love a jacket that glows in the dark because it is full of radioactive gas. That sounds great… And they thought that lead was bad in paint. Soon China will be returning toys to the US because we painted them with glow in the dark radiation…
December 30th, 2007 at 11:02 pm
((( daniel says:
December 29th, 2007 at 1:59 am
Why yes, I would love a jacket that glows in the dark because it is full of radioactive gas. That sounds great… And they thought that lead was bad in paint. Soon China will be returning toys to the US because we painted them with glow in the dark radiation…)))
Just so you know, that monitor your using to type stuff like that is beaming radiation in to your head along with countless other household items.
December 31st, 2007 at 1:33 pm
Yes the jacket is 5,000 pound crush resistant….but your body isnt
January 3rd, 2008 at 2:57 am
Hehe, these work because they’re radioactive
January 3rd, 2008 at 4:08 am
Wait till a rapper gets his hands on this. Glowing grillz, slimer 26’s on the glowing escalade. oh my!
January 13th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Soylent Green is PEOPLE!!!
February 7th, 2008 at 11:17 pm
lol pretty soon you can use this shizzle to underglow ur car. im lookin forward to it, if u can let me know when and where it will be available.
February 15th, 2008 at 3:56 pm
What’s wrong with a bit of darkness?
May 6th, 2008 at 5:28 pm
That is truly amazing practical solution of so many ‘night problems’. This company is going to make a fantastic profit, if they are really going to bring this product to the market.
May 19th, 2008 at 11:09 pm
Is there a catch? Maybe non-toxic to use, but what about to produce? Seems too good to be true, but then again … *could* it be all good? If so, will big coal and oil buy this technology and then bury it (or whatnot)? We sure need technologies similar to this to start taking wing. ‘Course I also worry about application and durability. Disposability is what our businesses thrive on. All the petrol-plastic ever made still exists in our environment, and this surely will be used with plastic, as it can be mixed in. Ugh, glowing trash… What we really need is to stop acquiring things (which we typically abandon using within 6 months) and instead go plant a garden. Ok, off my soap box…
May 20th, 2008 at 12:33 am
Sounds like they’re using tritium, which is totally safe. The beta particles released are low energy and can’t penetrate anything for the most part, including your skin. Also, tritium is a gas, so any breakage would result in tritium being released and dissipated in the air, which is harmless. Why do I know? Because I searched high and low for a tritium watch and read all about the stuff. It’s pretty uber.
May 20th, 2008 at 12:37 am
Yeah Maxxy, you could almost replicate Automan’s car.
May 20th, 2008 at 12:41 am
Radio active nano-particles. Just what the world needs.
May 20th, 2008 at 12:43 am
I am skeptical. With the displayed level of brightness, maintained over 15 years, represents a large amount of energy. What kind of “radioactive gas” would release that much power?
May 20th, 2008 at 1:01 am
Who ever said that it is powered by radium?
I’m quite interested in how it works but we shouldn’t assume that science has lept back to 1950’s America where watch hands were painted with the stuff. Also LCD screens don’t emit radiation.
May 20th, 2008 at 1:12 am
Sounds like this is nothing more than tritium in microbeads. which is not really what you want possibly floating into your watersource.
May 20th, 2008 at 3:11 am
Ik wil, ik wil….(I want, I want..)
May 20th, 2008 at 4:05 am
Where the hell have you lot got “radioactive” from? It clearly says on their homepage “non-radioactive”. Learn to read and stop scare mongering.
May 20th, 2008 at 6:05 am
it lasts for 15 years…what happens when you want to “turn it off”?
May 20th, 2008 at 6:09 am
May 20th, 2008 at 6:44 am
Can this be added to the paint used in the “yellow lines” on highways??
Maybe paint a few guard-rails too.
Make the highway systems look like Tron!
All joking aside. This technology has the possibility of saving many lives. Buy your stock in this company early.
May 20th, 2008 at 7:56 am
If this is made of Tritium which I bet it is (half life of Tritium ~ 12.3 years). I thought the US banned the importation and commercial use of this stuff. They do use it in nuclear weapons. They never let us have any fun.
May 20th, 2008 at 8:16 am
Kids:
What’s really “amazing” is a skill called “critical thinking.” Think. Read.
May 20th, 2008 at 8:33 am
Too bad they can’t use a gas with a longer half life, that would be awesome. But they are all probably too radioactive to be used, depending on exactly how resistant to electron penetration the glass and polymer walls are. If they are actually 100% resistant, or very close to it, then i dont see why they couldn’t use a different, longer half life gas. You might be able to make these things last for decades or even a century or more.
May 20th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Tritium?
Homeland Stupidity already limits TRitum into the Country for fear of contamination \ dirty bombs etc.. how is this different?
What is the active ingredient?
Anyone?
May 20th, 2008 at 9:31 am
LOL ok nevermind…
I just read the patent app…
2. A self-luminous microsphere as set forth in claim 1, wherein the gas is tritium.
Good luck selling it in the states or buying it. I’ll bet consumers never see the stuff.
May 20th, 2008 at 10:07 am
You gan buy it here:
http://www.glopaint.com/24orders.htm
May 20th, 2008 at 10:47 am
How about tattoo ink?
May 20th, 2008 at 10:48 am
Traffic signs, road paint, emergency exit lights, communications towers, bikes, sporting goods, golf balls, dog collars, and more! If the paintable stuff does work well, then we just saved millions in energy, but also lives. When the street lights go out, the signs will glow and the lines on the road will be visible at any time, day or night!
May 20th, 2008 at 11:38 am
According to their website “Our products are LEAD FREE and Non-Radioactive!”
May 20th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Finally: this is the thing to coat a hockey puck with so we can see it on TV.
May 20th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
A light source that lasts for 15 years on it’s on, and yet, battery technology remains the same as long as it keeps making companies rich. When is someone going to convert something like this into usable amps to power our devices for 15 years?
May 20th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Summary:
Tiny glass balls filled with a stuff that glows when hit by electrons, and gas that spews out electrons.
The electrons cannot penetrate the gas balls, so it’s safe.
The glass balls are so small that if damaged, the escaping gas is negligable.
And yes it is using radiation - beta - which is not considered dangerous (how this paint works is conceptually the same as how a CRT monitor works).
May 20th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
How about a glowing jumpsuit for when i am riding my motorcycle at night. Wait’s for the next Driver to say (s)he didn’t see him.
May 20th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
lcd screens do emit radiation, it’s called light…
May 20th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Y’all, we can’t use these for road markings, the microshpere’s crush at 5000lbs of pressure. If I load up my single axle, two wheel trailer to 11000 GVW, then every time I change lanes, I’ll be releasing tritium into the atmosphere, and blacking out the road lines.
May 20th, 2008 at 2:00 pm
The company is playing fast and loose w/ the “non-radioactive” claim. Maybe they mean no radioactivity is released from the product, but considering that they use tritium (3H), it definitely contains radioactive material. The comparison #7 made to monitors isn’t really valid, 3H emits ionizing radiation, a monitor (or flashlight) emits non-ionizing radiation, BIG difference. Still, a couple of nanocuries of 3H shouldn’t be a big deal. 3H is used in Luminox watches right now, so it’s not really novel, probably just miniaturized so that it can be used in paints, etc.
May 20th, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Looks like this is indeed Tritium and IS INDEED radioactive, just another way to put more deadly particles of radioactive waste into our environment. Sure they claim none of the Tritium can escape, please remember scientists make mistakes, and salesmen will willingly sell anything to make a profit, even if it kills the whole planet after they make the sale.
May 20th, 2008 at 3:01 pm
Ok… you people do realize that this is vaporware and basically amounts to a meaningless publicity stunt…?
There is nothing whatsoever on the website that details anything about how this magical material actually functions or from where it obtains its absurdly abundant energy.
The “award” they got from NASA was basically for having the coolest-sounding idea… they are not required to explain how it works or actually demonstrate that they have created anything.
Believe it when there’s something in the store you can pay money for. Right now it’s just snake-oil, and you’re a sucker for buying into it.
May 20th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
I like The Tron Idea, all roads and guardrails…Cooool
May 20th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Analog Science Fact & Fiction ran a story once about windows that captured the past and let it out again years later. A man who had lost his family had the windows in his house, showing the family scenes from years ago. Readers wrote in explaining that such a window would contain so much energy it would be hazardous, to put it mildly. So how is this new invention supposed to contain so much energy to provide all that endless illumination locked inside it, without being dangerous to health and safety?
May 20th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
I wanna glow while i sleep,i hope it’s gonna be available soon.
May 20th, 2008 at 6:08 pm
from Wikipedia:
“The low-energy beta radiation from tritium cannot penetrate human skin, so tritium is only dangerous if inhaled or ingested.”
Sounds as safe as lead paint.
May 20th, 2008 at 6:49 pm
I do believe I need a tat…..
May 20th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
Just be sure not to let Doc Ock find out where you store all the Tritium.
May 20th, 2008 at 8:19 pm
Ha! Tattoo Ink is a cool thought. William Gibson didn’t even think of that in Neuromancer. I’d like a glowing dragon for sure, especially with multiple colours.
May 20th, 2008 at 8:27 pm
This product is not dangerous.
The tritium used is encased in small glass beads so that both the gas and the beta radiation cannot leak, and is stored in these beads to minimize spillage if they rupture.
Even if it leaks, the low-energy beta radiation from tritium cannot penetrate human skin, so tritium is only dangerous if inhaled or ingested.
@Lenny: This is not yet for sale, all of the products on that page only glow for a few hours, and must be “charged” in another light source.
May 20th, 2008 at 10:39 pm
It says “non-toxic” - Tritium is not toxic, it’s a beta emitter version of Hydrogen. Beta particles are just accelerated electrons like old style CRTs & TVs. They won’t even penetrate your skin, let alone the borosilicate glass Tritium is commonly packaged in.
It’s banned from export, not import.
Radioluminescent tech got a bad rep because early versions used Radium which is a very strongly chemically reactive alpha & gamma emitter that decays into an Radon gas which is also an alpha emitter that you can inhale. Alpha particles can cause nuclear transmutation, which is very strong carcinogen.
What most people don’t realize is that both coal and oil contain radioactive elements that are released in significant amounts when they are burned in volume. By contrast, beta radioluminescent tech produces less radiation and of a much safer type. Don’t be scared by the word ‘radiation’ - even visible light is a type of radiation.
May 21st, 2008 at 4:16 am
Great.
Glowing plastic trash. Maybe we’ll finally see the Pacific Gyre from space!
Would be nice to know how these will decompose and how long until it is in the food chain.
Can’t wait to glow in the dark too.
May 21st, 2008 at 12:51 pm
Been here, done this. Search around for some older exit signs and you’ll find that they’re “powered” by glass vials of tritium. The only new thing is that they’re packing it in microbeads. It takes a very tiny amount of shielding to protect us from the particles this gives off, as they are relatively low energy. Other materials with longer lives typically are of higher energy. Besides, who wants to deal with nuclear waste from a raincoat that was shredded 40 years ago?
May 21st, 2008 at 6:29 pm
I don’t see LITROENERGY for sale ANYWHERE.
Odd link to glowpaint because “glow paint” requires light, THEN glows a while. Read this about LITROENERGY:
“without any exposure to light”
Whereas GLOWPAINT says:
“Each time the item you have painted is exposed to light for 15 minutes the item will glow in the dark.”
“Litrospheres (non-toxic) emit light continuously for 12 plus years (half-life point) without any exposure to a light or other energy (not effected by cold or heat).”
http://www.createthefuturecontest.com/pages/view/entriesdetail.html?entryID=567
May 22nd, 2008 at 6:07 am
Wow can you imagine how this could change third world countries with no power? Imagine lighting your house for free !
May 22nd, 2008 at 3:18 pm
One supposes the tritium gas is “non toxic” as long as it is contained within the 5Klb crush resistant “micro-spheres”?
Well, certainly, they could advertise it is 100% natural too. Wonder what the inventors def of “non toxic” is??
What do we really need this stuff for? I could see a glowing string bikini on an exotic dancer under black light doing her thing, maybe. When was the last time anyone really used a “glow stick” rather than a flashligt to illuminate something? Don’t reflectors work well enough in presence of car headlights?
Wow, soon we will not have any dark left and be constantly bombarded by glowing everything so we are “safer” during the evil night. This sounds a lot like that gyroscopic unicycle thing that was supposed to revolutionize the world. Ride a bike, get a flashlight. I’ve got an LED one with a crank. I’m sure it is good for 25 years or so since the actual time it’s ever been utilized is so limited. I’ve got 25 year old flashlights that still work too! Probably better to invent a better battery for those old flashlights that still work.
May 22nd, 2008 at 5:03 pm
Are they going to make glow-in-the-dark stars with this stuff?
I’d LOVE to put some of those on the walls of my room!
June 3rd, 2008 at 10:08 am
I would like to wear this wardrobe for my 1st marriage anniversary:), it looks cool.
June 27th, 2008 at 1:16 am
Okay …. sooo… this is not kid friendly but IS a good idea…. Road lines… maybe not but guard rails, signs, towers, car paint… all totally acceptable and since is a gas and not a solid its Unlike Lead paint… if you were to paint a room with it and they were to all break at the same time it would not be harmful unless the room was sealed… and the person stayed in there for a excessive amount of time… I would love to see sumwun steal a glowing car…. lol no wun would notice that….
and this does have 10000 of uses if i had sum money to invest freely believe me i would put Some.. Not All my money into this company… Beta particles are harmless to humans…. so dont go on about radiation dangers… Learn to read up before you mindlessly post a comment about a possibly fantastic idea…
July 13th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
More Nukes, Less Kooks!
Sounds like a great idea to me!
I wish them luck marketing it to the same clowns who hold up grocery store lines making the clerks manually enter every item because they don’t want their purchases ‘contaminated by laser radiation.’
August 19th, 2008 at 4:15 am
Unless the laws have been changed these will not be available in at least the U.S. and Germany, if you want to see something that’s already in production and has been for years using an almost identical system google Trasers.